Investment in existing flood infrastructure increases by just £3m in ten years

  • England urgently needs funding for flood defences to increase by 45%
  • Annual investment in flood infrastructure increases by £68m
  • In less than 50 years, the number of homes under threat from flooding in England is forecast to double to five million.

Central government funding for existing flood infrastructure has only increased by £3m since 2009/10 according to the latest analysis from Scape Group, a public sector procurement specialist (see table 2). The research finds that, while total expenditure has increased in real terms from £802m in 2009/10 to £870m in 2018/19 (see table 1), the majority of the £64m increase has been in capital spending, while revenue spending, which goes towards staff and office costs, as well as the vital maintenance of existing assets, has fluctuated from a low of £272m in 2013/14 to a high of £344m in 2017/18.

Even funding for capital projects, which has increased to £453m in 2018/19, equates to only a £34m annual real terms increase in central government funding since 2009/10. The research reveals that in England there is an urgent need to increase funding over the next ten years, with Scape Group recommending a 45% increase to allow sufficient prevention and protection and address the rising threat from flooding and coastal erosion.

Mark Robinson, Scape Group chief executive, commented, “The data shows a limited real term increase over the last decade and we urgently need the amount of funding for flood protection to increase. We also need to be thinking critically about how we work together more effectively. Harnessing the knowledge and expertise of our experts and collaborating to operate across boundaries to deliver essential infrastructure needs to be a priority.

“It is especially concerning to see that revenue expenditure has barely risen over the last ten years, with real term growth of just £3m. A lot of our water infrastructure is from the Victorian era, it is hundreds of years old and desperately needs to be maintained and upgraded, but we are in the difficult, almost impossible situation of having competing pressures on the limited resources we have at our disposal.”

Table 1 Expenditure on flood and coastal erosion risk management 2009/10 to 2018/19

Year

Government funded expenditure FCERM FDGiA (revenue)

Government funded expenditure FCERM FDGiA (capital)

Expenditure funded by charges / levies / other income - FCERM / LL / PF / Other income

Core DEFRA retained funding (including resources paid to LLFA)

MHCLG (resources paid to LLFA)

Total

Total – real terms

2009/10

£260m

£360m

£57m

£13m

-

£690m

£802m

2010/11

£292m

£360m

£48m

£19m

-

£719m

£821m

2011/12

£288m

£261m

£51m

£24m

-

£624m

£703m

2012/13

£268m

£269m

£48m

£39m

-

£624m

£689m

2013/14

£251m

£315m

£71m

£19m

£21m

£677m

£734m

2014/15

£283m

£467m

£68m

£33m

£21m

£872m

£934m

2015/16

£275m

£391m

£75m

£25m

£20m

£786m

£835m

2016/17

£315m

£447m

£82m

£2m

£31m

£877m

£911m

2017/18

£338m

£402m

£79m

£3m

£32m

£854m

£870m

2018/19

£305m

£453m

£78m

£2m

£32m

£870m

£870m

 

Table 2: Revenue expenditure by the Environment Agency on flood and coastal erosion risk management 2009/10 to 2018/19

Year

Government funded expenditure FCERM FDGiA (revenue)

Government funded expenditure FCERM FDGiA (revenue) – real terms

2009/10

£260m

£302m

2010/11

£292m

£333m

2011/12

£288m

£325m

2012/13

£268m

£296m

2013/14

£251m

£272m

2014/15

£283m

£303m

2015/16

£275m

£292m

2016/17

£315m

£327m

2017/18

£338m

£344m

2018/19

£305m

£305m

 

Scape Group’s report, ‘A Climate Emergency: Flood Defences for the Future’ also looks at regional variations in contributions towards flood and coastal erosion risk management. The analysis found that spending in Yorkshire and The Humber has decreased, falling in the last few years by £7m, from a high of £21.7m in 2016/17 to £14.91m in 2018/19, despite the area consistently experiencing extreme weather and flash flooding. Local levy contributions to the Environment Agency from local authorities also vary across the country, with London consistently making the largest contribution at over £5.9m for each of the last four years; a similar contribution to that of the West Midlands, North East and Yorkshire and The Humber combined.

Mark Robinson, Scape Group chief executive, commented, “In the 21st century, an increasing number of households are going to be living in areas at high risk of flooding, due to new homes being built on flood plains and the rapid erosion of our coastlines. In less than 50 years, the number of homes under threat in England is forecast to double to five million. Climate change is one of the greatest threats facing the country today. It is one of the greatest challenges of our time and it needs our immediate and consistent attention.

“For every £1 we invest in flood protection schemes it saves us £5 in property damages. The return on investment for flood protection is significantly higher than other sectors, so it makes financial sense for the Treasury to invest in flood and coastal erosion risk management.

“The recommendations we have put forward aim to provide workable solutions for combatting the threat of climate change on our flood defences, while protecting our homes, businesses and communities.”

Dean Banks, Chief Executive Officer of Balfour Beatty commented, “Recent years have seen increasingly frequent and devastating floods across the country. The construction and infrastructure industry mitigate flood risk by building defences and implementing resilience measures. And when extreme weather hits, we are a critical part of the response: getting the roads, buildings, bridges and other affected infrastructure back to work to ensure that communities can recover as quickly as possible.

“But there is more to do. Engaging the construction and infrastructure industry earlier and proactively before flooding happens can help reduce the risk and make the clean-up run more smoothly. We also need more partnership working between local authorities, and a more strategic, longer-term funding approach for flood and coastal risk management. The price of flooding to local communities – and to the wider economy – far outstrips the cost of building and maintaining effective flood defences and resilience measures.”

Following their analysis, Scape Group has made a series of recommendations for the construction industry, policymakers and local government to help implement more efficient and effective ways of addressing the impact climate change is having on our inland and coastal flood defences:

  1. A 45% increase in Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Funding for England

The financial benefit of upfront investment in flood defence work is undeniable. Combined with the physical and mental devastation extreme weather causes for people in affected communities, this provides a strong argument for increasing funding for the Environment Agency by 45% over the next six years. In addition, budgets for local authorities should be ring-fenced so that vital flood defence work is undertaken, not only in terms of new infrastructure, but improving the quality of existing assets. Although local authorities are under significant pressure to deliver services with constrained budgets, climate change is one of the biggest threats facing the country and it needs to be a priority for both central and local government.

  1. Increased collaboration between local authorities

The partnership model, which is being used effectively in parts of England, should be further developed and implemented across the country. Local authorities combining resources and working collaboratively to deliver flood protection schemes and coastal erosion projects provides clear, tangible efficiencies, such as those being delivered by Coastal Partnership East. Councils in the same area face similar challenges. Working in partnership gives them the ability to mobilise a well-resourced team, harnessing the relevant skills and expertise to plan and efficiently deliver projects that are urgently needed.

  1. A holistic view of flooding types to drive cohesive and robust flood protection strategies

The three types of flooding we have highlighted within this report are regularly viewed in isolation. We urgently need to take a more holistic approach to assessing the impact of climate change, in order to create cohesive and robust strategies to counteract its impact both along our coast and inland.

  1. Adopt innovative approaches that utilise natural flood protection methods

As the impact of climate change becomes increasingly evident, we need to be responding with more innovative approaches and solutions, sharing best practice and taking a lesson learned approach from the flood protection strategies implement in other countries. The reality is that storm surges and flash flooding are only going to increase, and we need to learn to live with the water, rather than fighting against it.

The full Scape Group report, A Climate Emergency: Flood Defences for the Future, can be downloaded from http://bit.ly/ScapeFloodReport